试论我国动产抵押制度的缺陷-兼评《物权法》第188条之动产抵
内容简介： 动产抵押的制度设计打破了传统物权法上“不动产抵押——动产质押”的二元化担保物权格式，并给传统物权公示方法提出了挑战。传统的动产占有或交付之公示制度已无法起到公示作用，登记的公示方法转而延伸到了动产抵押权上。我国新颁布的《物权法》同一采登记对抗主义的动产抵押公示效力；而登记对抗主义的'症结在于，该公示方法及效力导致传统动产物权变动规则体系的***。本文通过检讨动产抵押的公示制度来管窥该制度的先天缺陷，并通过制度比较，建议在未来的我国立法中，废除动产抵押，转而规定让与担保来发挥其制度功能。The system of chattel mortgage has not only changed completely the pattern of security interests in the traditional real rights law, which holds the dualism of ‘immovables-mortgage’and‘movables-pledge’, but also challenges the publication method of the traditional property law. Since possession or delivery of chattel can’t take its effect, registration has been applicable to chattel mortgage. The new promulgated Real Rights Law of People’s Republic of China makes the stipulation of registration antagonism of chattel mortgage, which destroys the traditional chattel variation system. Since chattel mortgage has its inherent defect, the author of this *** suggests Chinese legislation supersede entirely chattel mortgage with the system of alienation guarantee.【试论我国动产抵押制度的缺陷-兼评《物权法》第188条之动产抵】相关文章：
2.不动产抵押融资